Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-18

RANA PRATAP SINGH vs VITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI DIST. BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Citation / case number
SC 2018/9716
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent
VITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI DIST. BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's dismissal of the appellant's Special Appeal, affirming that the appointment of the petitioner as Junior Accounts Clerk was temporary and contingent upon the promotion status of Shiv Kumar Rai. The Court emphasized that the appointment could be terminated if the original position of Shiv Kumar Rai was reinstated, thereby validating the actions taken under the Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985. The Court concluded that the termination of the petitioner's appointment was lawful and did not violate any statutory provisions.

RANA PRATAP SINGH vs VITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI DIST. BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER · Niyam