Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-06

HAV (OFC) RWMWI BORGOYARY vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/45980
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HAV (OFC) RWMWI BORGOYARY
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of the Appellants' applications challenging their ineligibility for the Technical Equipment Officer (TEO) position, citing the eligibility criteria outlined in the AG's Branch/MP-2 letter dated 17.01.2007. The Court emphasized that the criteria included a minimum of 10 years of service and specific qualifications, which the Appellants did not meet. Consequently, the Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, reinforcing the importance of adhering to established eligibility standards in military appointments.

HAV (OFC) RWMWI BORGOYARY vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam