Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-10

BGS SGS SOMA JV vs NHPC LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2018/34840
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BGS SGS SOMA JV
Respondent
NHPC LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the maintainability of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, determining that the seat of arbitration is crucial for filing a petition under Section 34. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the contract clearly delineates the procedure for dispute resolution, emphasizing that the seat of arbitration influences the jurisdiction for appeals. The judgment clarifies the implications of the arbitration agreement and the relevant statutory provisions, affirming the need for precise identification of the arbitration seat.

BGS SGS SOMA JV vs NHPC LTD. · Niyam