Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-17

DR. (MAJOR) MEETA SAHAI vs STATE OF BIHAR

Citation / case number
SC 2017/10021
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. (MAJOR) MEETA SAHAI
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that Rule 6(iii) of the Bihar Health Service (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2013, which restricts work experience to only that gained in government-run hospitals in Bihar, is valid. The Court held that the State's decision to not consider the appellant's experience in an Army Hospital for the post of General Medical Officer was justified, as the rule explicitly mandates the type of experience required. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

DR. (MAJOR) MEETA SAHAI vs STATE OF BIHAR · Niyam