Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-13

Rajnish Kumar Mishra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1941
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajnish Kumar Mishra
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Author
Chief Justice
Bench
Surya Kant, B.R. Gavai, S.A. Bobde

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of regularization of ad-hoc employees under the Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Services of Ad-hoc Employees Act, 2014. The Court held that the orders of regularization issued by the District Judge were valid and could not be declared non-est by a successor. It emphasized that the principles of natural justice must be adhered to in employment matters, particularly when employees have served for an extended period. The Court ultimately set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' writ petitions and reinstated their regularization, ensuring their rights were protected under the law.

Rajnish Kumar Mishra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ... · Niyam