Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-10

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Sudarshana Chatterjee

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1914
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Sudarshana Chatterjee
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the appellants' order denying retiral benefits to the respondent, emphasizing that the denial was unjustified as the respondent had sought necessary permissions to join Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences. The Court reiterated that the principles of natural justice must be adhered to in administrative decisions, particularly in matters concerning retirement benefits. The appellants were directed to reconsider the respondent's claim in light of the High Court's observations, ensuring compliance with relevant service regulations.

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Sudarshana Chatterjee · Niyam