Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-08-09

WAINGANGA BAHUDDESHIYA VIKAS SANSTHA THR. PRESIDENT B.B. KARANJEKAR vs KU. JAYA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/4406
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
WAINGANGA BAHUDDESHIYA VIKAS SANSTHA THR. PRESIDENT B.B. KARANJEKAR
Respondent
KU. JAYA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of an ad-hoc lecturer's services, based on unsatisfactory performance, does not carry a stigma and is permissible under the terms of the appointment. The Court emphasized that the appointment was not on probation but purely ad-hoc, allowing for termination without notice as per the appointment conditions. The Division Bench of the High Court was found to have exceeded its jurisdiction by implying a stigma where none existed, thus reversing the High Court's order and upholding the termination.

WAINGANGA BAHUDDESHIYA VIKAS SANSTHA THR. PRESIDENT B.B. KARANJEKAR vs KU. JAYA · Niyam