Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-08-22

AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD. vs CAPT. GURDARSHAN KAUR SANDHU

Citation / case number
SC 2018/38495
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD.
Respondent
CAPT. GURDARSHAN KAUR SANDHU
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that a pilot's resignation, once tendered, cannot be unilaterally withdrawn without the employer's consent, as per the Civil Aviation Requirements issued under the Aircraft Act, 1934. The Court emphasized that the regulations, particularly Rule 133A, mandate compliance with directions issued by the Director-General of Civil Aviation, which includes notice periods for resignations. The appeal by Air India Express Ltd. was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that upheld the pilot's resignation as effective and binding.

AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD. vs CAPT. GURDARSHAN KAUR SANDHU · Niyam