Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-08-08

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD vs CANARA BANK

Citation / case number
SC 2014/11020
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD
Respondent
CANARA BANK
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute between MTNL and Canara Bank regarding the cancellation of bonds worth Rs. 80 crores issued by MTNL. The Court held that Canara Bank, as the holder in due course, is entitled to have the bonds registered in its name and receive accrued interest, despite MTNL's claims of non-payment by CANFINA. The Court emphasized the principles of negotiable instruments under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and ruled in favor of Canara Bank, directing MTNL to register the bonds and pay the interest due.

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD vs CANARA BANK · Niyam