Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-08-27

Jayesh H.Pandya vs Subhtex India Limited Through Its ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1066
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jayesh H.Pandya
Respondent
Subhtex India Limited Through Its ...
Author
Ajay Rastogi
Bench
Ajay Rastogi, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellants had waived their right to extend the arbitration proceedings beyond the stipulated four-month period as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically under Section 11. The Court emphasized that the appointment of an arbitrator and the validity of the arbitration agreement could be contested before the arbitrator under Section 16 of the Act. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the arbitration petition was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

Jayesh H.Pandya vs Subhtex India Limited Through Its ... · Niyam