Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-04-22

Anil Kumar Anand vs Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive)

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 2634
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anil Kumar Anand
Respondent
Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive)
Author
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs and CESTAT regarding the revaluation of imported goods under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically citing Section 28 for recovery of duties. The court established that the method of valuation under Rule 7 and Rule 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 was correctly applied, rejecting the appellant's claims of improper implementation. The court affirmed the imposition of differential duty and penalties on the appellant and its directors, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Anil Kumar Anand vs Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive) · Niyam