Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-09-14

M/S ZHEJIANG BONLY ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL MANUFACTURE CO. LTD. vs M/S JADE ELEVATOR COMPONENTS

Citation / case number
SC 2018/24145
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S ZHEJIANG BONLY ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL MANUFACTURE CO. LTD.
Respondent
M/S JADE ELEVATOR COMPONENTS
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating an arbitration petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, held that the dispute resolution clause in the Commission Processing Contract allowed for arbitration after failed consultation. The Court emphasized that the clause did not mandate court adjudication, thus affirming the petitioner's right to seek arbitration. The Court appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes arising from the contract, thereby upholding the arbitration agreement between the parties.

M/S ZHEJIANG BONLY ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL MANUFACTURE CO. LTD. vs M/S JADE ELEVATOR COMPONENTS · Niyam