Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-09-13

PRAVESH KUMAR SACHDEVA vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2006/11723
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRAVESH KUMAR SACHDEVA
Respondent
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Allahabad High Court erred in setting aside a confirmed auction sale under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, despite no objections being filed by all private respondents. The Court emphasized that the objections were only filed by Alok Mitra, and thus the auction sale was valid as per Rule 285-I, which requires substantial injury to set aside a sale. The Court reinstated the auction sale, affirming the rights of the appellants.

PRAVESH KUMAR SACHDEVA vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam