Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-09-11

M.C.Mehta vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 160
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C.Mehta
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
Deepak Gupta, Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that land notified under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, in Haryana must be treated as 'forest land' and that construction by R. Kant & Co. on such land violates the notification dated 18th August 1992, as well as the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The Court emphasized the need for accountability from the State of Haryana for its conflicting positions and highlighted the severe environmental degradation resulting from unauthorized construction activities. The Court held that the actions of R. Kant & Co. are illegal and detrimental to ecological balance, affirming the need for strict adherence to environmental laws.

M.C.Mehta vs Union Of India · Niyam