Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-09-18

The State Of Orissa vs Mahimananda Mishra

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 302
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Orissa
Respondent
Mahimananda Mishra
Author
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, L. Nageswara Rao

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals by the State of Orissa and the informant against the High Court's bail order, emphasizing the serious nature of the charges under Sections 302 and 120B IPC, along with Sections 25(1)(B) and 27 of the Arms Act, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. The Court held that the respondent, being a powerful individual, posed a risk of influencing witnesses and absconding, thus justifying the denial of bail. The Court underscored the need for a thorough investigation and the gravity of the conspiracy to murder, affirming the necessity of custodial interrogation.

The State Of Orissa vs Mahimananda Mishra · Niyam