Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-09-24

Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh(D)Thru Lrs

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 977
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.
Respondent
Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh(D)Thru Lrs
Author
Arun Mishra
Bench
Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953, the late Jagirdar or his legal representatives cannot claim compensation for land acquisition after the abolition of Jagirs, as the land vested in the State and compensation had already been received under both the Abolition Act and the H.P. Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972. The Court emphasized that the land not under personal cultivation does not entitle the Jagirdar to further compensation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision regarding compensation.

Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh(D)Thru Lrs · Niyam