Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-03

M/S LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED SCOMI ENGINEERING BHD vs MUMBAI METROPOLITIAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Citation / case number
SC 2017/13248
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED SCOMI ENGINEERING BHD
Respondent
MUMBAI METROPOLITIAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasized the necessity of adhering to the arbitration clause stipulated in the contract. The Court held that failure to provide timely notice of claims as per the contract's terms would discharge the employer from liability, thereby reinforcing the importance of procedural compliance in arbitration agreements. The outcome affirmed the arbitration clause's enforceability, ensuring that disputes are resolved through arbitration as intended by the parties.

M/S LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED SCOMI ENGINEERING BHD vs MUMBAI METROPOLITIAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY · Niyam