Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-03

HONBLE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH (SOLE PETITIONER IN ALL MATTERS) vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 2017/11339
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HONBLE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH (SOLE PETITIONER IN ALL MATTERS)
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the inter se seniority dispute among members of the Punjab Superior Judicial Service, specifically regarding the promotion and recruitment quotas as per the Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that seniority should be determined based on the length of continuous service rather than the date of confirmation, as amended by Rule 12. The judgment clarified the application of the 50%-25%-25% promotion and recruitment quota, affirming the High Court's ruling on the seniority list dated 24.12.2007.

HONBLE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH (SOLE PETITIONER IN ALL MATTERS) vs STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam