Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-12

POWARI PANCHSHEEL CO-OP.HNG.STY.. vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA))

Citation / case number
SC 2008/11319
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
POWARI PANCHSHEEL CO-OP.HNG.STY..
Respondent
MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA))
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants against the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) regarding the sale of unsold flats. The Court clarified that the Board, as a statutory authority under the MHADA Act, 1976, has the discretion to set terms for the sale of flats, including price adjustments. The Court found no violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, affirming that the Board's actions were within its statutory powers and did not warrant judicial intervention.

POWARI PANCHSHEEL CO-OP.HNG.STY.. vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)) · Niyam