Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-25

The State Of Rajasthan vs Madan @ Madaniya

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 684
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Rajasthan
Respondent
Madan @ Madaniya
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N. V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's acquittal of the accused under Sections 302 and 460 IPC, emphasizing that the benefit of doubt should not be extended when ocular and forensic evidence strongly implicate the accused. The Court held that the High Court erred in its assessment of the evidence, which was sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. Consequently, the Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's conviction and sentence, affirming the principles of evidence evaluation in criminal cases.

The State Of Rajasthan vs Madan @ Madaniya · Niyam