M/S. Supertech Ltd. vs Rajni Goyal

The Supreme Court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's decision under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which partly allowed the Respondent's complaint against the Appellant-Builder for failing to deliver possession of a residential flat as per the Allotment Letter. The Court emphasized that the Appellant's demand for additional charges was unjustified due to the lack of an Occupancy Certificate at the time of the Pre-Possession Letter. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commission's order.