Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-30

Management Hindustan Machine Tools ... vs Ghanshyam Sharma

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 5280
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Management Hindustan Machine Tools ...
Respondent
Ghanshyam Sharma
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Indu Malhotra, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in restoring the Labour Court's award regarding the respondent's termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, specifically Section 10 and Section 11-A. The Court modified the Labour Court's award, stating that given the respondent's status as a casual worker and the significant time elapsed since his termination, a lump sum compensation should be awarded instead of reinstatement. The Court emphasized the need for practical resolution in cases involving casual employment and the passage of time since the dispute arose.

Management Hindustan Machine Tools ... vs Ghanshyam Sharma · Niyam