Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-10-03

Ram Lal vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 4616
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ram Lal
Respondent
The State Of Himachal Pradesh
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
Indira Banerjee, R. Banumathi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 13(1)(C) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and under Sections 409 and 477-A IPC for misappropriation of funds while serving as a public servant. The Court found sufficient evidence of the appellant's fraudulent activities, including making fake credit entries and pocketing deposits, resulting in a loss of Rs. 38,500 to the bank. The sentences of two years and five years of rigorous imprisonment were affirmed, with fines imposed, while acquitting the appellant of forgery charges under Sections 468 and 471 IPC due to lack of precise expert opinion.

Ram Lal vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh · Niyam