Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-11-19

Paritosh Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand Thr. The ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 927
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Paritosh Kumar
Respondent
The State Of Jharkhand Thr. The ...
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the disciplinary punishment imposed on the appellant was harsh and disproportionate, violating Articles 14, 16, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court clarified that the High Court's order quashing the previous punishment did not allow for reopening of disciplinary proceedings but permitted the authority to reconsider the quantum of punishment only. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of with directions for the authority to act in accordance with the High Court's ruling.

Paritosh Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand Thr. The ... · Niyam