Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-11-26

R.U. Patel Assistant Teacher vs Commissioner (Schools) Gujarat State

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 924
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R.U. Patel Assistant Teacher
Respondent
Commissioner (Schools) Gujarat State
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the termination of a teacher's service following disciplinary proceedings, emphasizing the importance of a prior proposal for reinstatement contingent on an unconditional apology and the forfeiture of backwages. The Court held that the Management must reconsider the termination upon receipt of the apology, allowing for the imposition of a penalty of barring two increments. The decision underscores the need for resolution in employment disputes while maintaining the continuity of service for other purposes.

R.U. Patel Assistant Teacher vs Commissioner (Schools) Gujarat State · Niyam