Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-11-22

Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs The State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 327
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Author
S.Abdul Nazeer
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR registered under Sections 376(2)(b), 420 IPC, and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. The Court found that the allegations in the FIR, if taken at face value, constituted offenses, and the appellant's claims of malicious prosecution were unsubstantiated. The Court emphasized that the exercise of powers under Section 482 should be sparingly used and only in exceptional cases where the proceedings are manifestly attended with mala fides.

Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs The State Of Maharashtra · Niyam