Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-08

EX NAVY DIRECT ENTRY ARTIFICERS ASSO. vs THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

Citation / case number
SC 2014/14020
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
EX NAVY DIRECT ENTRY ARTIFICERS ASSO.
Respondent
THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the eligibility of Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers for pension benefits under Regulation 78 of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, which requires a minimum of 15 years of service. The Court held that the period spent in Fleet Reserve, which counts as 50% towards pension eligibility, can be combined with the actual service of 10 years to meet the 15-year requirement. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of the appellants' claims for pensionary benefits.

EX NAVY DIRECT ENTRY ARTIFICERS ASSO. vs THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY · Niyam