Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-09

KALPANA MEHTA AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/36970
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KALPANA MEHTA AND ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the role of Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) reports in judicial proceedings, emphasizing the balance between constitutional interpretation and judicial restraint. It held that while PSC reports can be referenced for adjudicating facts, their use must align with constitutional supremacy and the principles of separation of powers. The Court underscored the need for a progressive interpretation of the Constitution, particularly in light of Article 21, while also considering the limitations imposed on legislative actions.

KALPANA MEHTA AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. · Niyam