Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-18

M/S. HARYANA SURAJ MALTING LTD. vs PHOOL CHAND

Citation / case number
SC 2010/2582
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. HARYANA SURAJ MALTING LTD.
Respondent
PHOOL CHAND
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court is functus officio after an award becomes enforceable, specifically under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court noted conflicting decisions in Sangham Tape Co. v. Hans Raj and Radhakrishna Mani Tripathi v. L.H. Patel regarding the timeline for recalling an ex parte award. It held that the issue requires clarification by a larger bench, as the interpretation of Sections 11(1), 17, and 20 of the Act leads to differing conclusions about the Tribunal's powers post-enforcement of an award.

M/S. HARYANA SURAJ MALTING LTD. vs PHOOL CHAND · Niyam