Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-11

COMMR.OF CENRAL EXCISE MADURAI vs M/S TCP LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/18452
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMR.OF CENRAL EXCISE MADURAI
Respondent
M/S TCP LTD.
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether certain charges levied by manufacturers of industrial gases are to be included in the valuation for excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court referred to previous conflicting judgments in Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. and Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd., and posed critical questions regarding the interpretation of 'transaction value' and the relationship between Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. The court emphasized the need for clarity on the nature and measure of excise duty, ultimately referring the matter to a larger bench for resolution.

COMMR.OF CENRAL EXCISE MADURAI vs M/S TCP LTD. · Niyam