Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-11

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S GOVIND POY OXYGEN LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

Citation / case number
SC 2008/26457
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Respondent
M/S GOVIND POY OXYGEN LTD. THROUGH MANAGER
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of charges such as packing, rental, and service fees in determining the value for excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that these charges should be included in the transaction value for excise duty assessment, clarifying the relationship between Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. The matter was referred to a larger bench due to conflicting precedents in Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. and Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S GOVIND POY OXYGEN LTD. THROUGH MANAGER · Niyam