Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-15

SELVI vs GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/19123
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SELVI
Respondent
GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS.
Author
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's preliminary decree for partition, affirming that the plaintiffs, Kalyani Pillai and Vasudevan Pillai, are entitled to redeem and recover possession of 7.40 acres of property under the mortgage agreement. The Court clarified that the plaintiffs, as heirs of the original mortgagors, have the right to redeem the mortgage despite the claims of the defendants. The High Court's decision to set aside the trial court's decree was reversed, reinforcing the plaintiffs' entitlement under the relevant property laws.

SELVI vs GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS. · Niyam