Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-11

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S. INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

Citation / case number
SC 2005/5731
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Respondent
M/S. INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH MANAGER
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of charges levied by manufacturers of industrial gases under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, determining whether these charges should be included in the transaction value for excise duty calculation. The court referred to previous conflicting judgments in Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. and Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd., and posed questions regarding the relationship between Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. The court held that the measure of excise duty must be determined by statutory provisions, allowing legislative discretion in defining the levy.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S. INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH MANAGER · Niyam