Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-15

Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi)

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1111
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sushila Aggarwal
Respondent
State (Nct Of Delhi)
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Navin Sinha, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the scope of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing that such bail should ordinarily continue until the trial unless misused. The Court held that anticipatory bail orders should not be of limited duration, as this contradicts the legislative intent established in the Sibbia case. The judgment reaffirmed that the trial court must ultimately assess the evidence and decide on bail, thereby ensuring that anticipatory bail does not bypass the regular judicial process.

Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) · Niyam