Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-03

Ameet Lalchand Shah vs Rishabh Enterprises

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 3041
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ameet Lalchand Shah
Respondent
Rishabh Enterprises
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's ruling that the agreements between Rishabh Enterprises and Astonfield Renewables do not contain an arbitration clause, thus precluding arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court affirmed that the agreements are not interconnected with the principal agreement dated 05.03.2012, following the precedent set in Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, maintaining the lower court's decision.

Ameet Lalchand Shah vs Rishabh Enterprises · Niyam