Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-08

Basanti Devi(D) By Lrs.. vs Rati Ram

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 2336
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Basanti Devi(D) By Lrs..
Respondent
Rati Ram
Author
S.Abdul Nazeer
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's decision that Smt. Chhimli did not acquire absolute ownership of the property under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as her late husband Sheo Lal had only a limited right to use the land per the compromise decree. The Court emphasized that the limited right granted to Smt. Chhimli did not convert into full ownership upon her husband's death, thus affirming the plaintiffs' entitlement to the property. The appeal by the defendants was dismissed, restoring the Trial Court's decree in favor of the plaintiffs.

Basanti Devi(D) By Lrs.. vs Rati Ram · Niyam