Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-05-11

Mahesh Chandra Verma vs The State Of Jharkhand State Of ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mahesh Chandra Verma
Respondent
The State Of Jharkhand State Of ...
Author
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Chelameswar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the services rendered by Fast Track Court Judges are to be counted for pensionary and other benefits when they subsequently join the regular judicial service. This decision was based on the interpretation of the Fast Track Courts Scheme and the constitutional provisions under Article 275, which mandates the establishment of such courts. The Court emphasized the importance of recognizing the contributions of these judges to ensure their rights are protected, thereby holding that their prior service is valid for benefits.

Mahesh Chandra Verma vs The State Of Jharkhand State Of ... · Niyam