Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-28

KRISHNAKANT TAMRAKAR vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2017/33352
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRISHNAKANT TAMRAKAR
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of delay in hearing appeals, emphasizing the importance of timely justice as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court noted that the appellant had been in custody for over ten years without bail or a hearing of his appeal, which could render the appeal meaningless. While the Court did not grant bail, it issued notice to explore remedies for expediting the hearing of appeals, referencing the need for increased judicial capacity and adherence to timelines in justice delivery as highlighted in previous judgments and reports.

KRISHNAKANT TAMRAKAR vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam