Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-28

HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD REGISTRAR GENERAL vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2017/30241
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD REGISTRAR GENERAL
Respondent
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of seniority determination for promotee and direct recruit Higher Judicial Service officers in Uttar Pradesh, focusing on Rules 22 and 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The Court held that seniority must be determined based on the availability of vacancies and the timing of appointments, reaffirming principles established in previous cases such as All India Judges Association v. Union of India and P.K. Dixit v. State of U.P. The judgment clarified that promotees' seniority should commence from the date they could have been appointed against an available vacancy.

HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD REGISTRAR GENERAL vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam