Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-06

SITARAM vs RADHEY SHYAM VISHNAV

Citation / case number
SC 2017/23778
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SITARAM
Respondent
RADHEY SHYAM VISHNAV
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the election petition by the Rajasthan High Court, affirming the Election Tribunal's decision that the petition was not compliant with Rule 3(d) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Election Petition Rules, 2009, which mandates the filing of a treasury challan of Rs. 1,000. The Court emphasized that non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements justifies rejection under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the necessity of adhering to election petition rules.

SITARAM vs RADHEY SHYAM VISHNAV · Niyam