Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-22

THE STATE OF BIHAR vs M/S BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

Citation / case number
SC 2017/18740
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Respondent
M/S BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the conflict between the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Bihar Public Works Contracts Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008. It held that the Bihar Act does not exclude the Central Act but rather supplements it, as per Section 8 of the Bihar Act, which states that in case of conflict, the Central Act shall prevail. The Court affirmed the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Central Act, emphasizing the binding nature of the arbitration agreement executed by the parties on June 22, 2012.

THE STATE OF BIHAR vs M/S BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED · Niyam