Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-21

MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJU vs PEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2016/30385
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJU
Respondent
PEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS.
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to strike off certain paragraphs of the election petition and dismiss the petition itself, citing Sections 81, 83, and 100 of The Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Court established that the election petition did not disclose a valid cause of action as required under the Act, and the High Court's ruling was found to be justified. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the election of the respondent as valid.

MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJU vs PEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. · Niyam