Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-19

KARSHANBHAI RAMJIBHAI JALADIYA vs DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2016/17197
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KARSHANBHAI RAMJIBHAI JALADIYA
Respondent
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ANR.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in a service law matter, held that the appellants, who had been denied reinstatement while their juniors were retained, were entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs. 6,50,000 each due to prolonged litigation. The Court noted that the initial compensation of Rs. 1,85,000 was inadequate given the circumstances. Additionally, it granted preferential appointment to one appellant for future vacancies, clarifying that the judgment is based on the peculiar facts of the case and shall not serve as a precedent.

KARSHANBHAI RAMJIBHAI JALADIYA vs DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ANR. · Niyam