Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-22

M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2015/10534
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of amendments to objections raised under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that while amendments beyond the limitation period should not be allowed, objections to jurisdiction can still be raised under Section 34 even if not previously raised under Section 16. The Court distinguished its findings from MSP Infrastructure Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd., clarifying that the phraseology in Section 34 does not preclude such objections. The outcome affirmed the High Court's decision to allow the amendment but noted the limitations on its application.

M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam