DIRECTOR ARYABHATTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCES (ARIES) vs DEVENDRA JOSHI .

The Supreme Court held that the termination of Respondent No.1's services was invalid as it was executed beyond the probation period stipulated by the amended bye-laws. The Court emphasized that the principles of natural justice were not followed, as Respondent No.1 was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself against the allegations of misconduct. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the termination order, reinforcing the necessity of adherence to procedural fairness in employment matters under Service Law.