Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-28

Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis vs Union Of India Minsitry Of Law And ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1194
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis
Respondent
Union Of India Minsitry Of Law And ...
Author
L. Nageswara Rao
Bench
S.A.Bobde, L.Nageswara Rao

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to decline the petitioner's request to reopen the investigation into Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, emphasizing that the matter had been conclusively resolved with convictions based on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence. The Court noted that there is no legal provision for reviewing such long-concluded criminal cases, particularly when the facts are well-established and the accused are deceased. The Court reiterated that the right to know the truth does not extend to reopening cases based on new academic research that does not present new evidence.

Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis vs Union Of India Minsitry Of Law And ... · Niyam