Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-27

Manju Surana vs Sunil Arora

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1002
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Manju Surana
Respondent
Sunil Arora
Author
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Chelameswar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, read with Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is mandatory before initiating any investigation against public servants for corruption allegations. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision to dismiss the complaint due to the absence of such sanction, referencing the precedent set in Anil Kumar v. M.K. Aiyappa. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the requirement for sanction as a prerequisite for prosecution.

Manju Surana vs Sunil Arora · Niyam