Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-28

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs S. Martin

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 1647
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Tamil Nadu
Respondent
S. Martin
Author
Uday Umesh Lalit
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to quash Crime No. 304 of 2012 under Sections 294(A), 420, and 120(b) IPC was justified as the prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients of the alleged offences. The Court emphasized that mere possession of unaccounted money does not constitute an offence without clear evidence of wrongdoing, and the creation of an ante-dated document using non-judicial stamp papers does not amount to forgery under the IPC. The appeal by the State of Tamil Nadu was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs S. Martin · Niyam