Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-23

Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar ... vs The State Of Jharkhand

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 1587
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar ...
Respondent
The State Of Jharkhand
Author
Ashok Bhushan
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 357(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the imposition of a fine by the trial court is automatically stayed upon filing an appeal, thus the High Court's direction to deposit the fine amount was erroneous. The Court emphasized that the fine should not be required until the appeal is resolved, aligning with the principles established in Dilip S. Dahanukar vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order to deposit the fine was set aside.

Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar ... vs The State Of Jharkhand · Niyam