Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-07

Bhupendra Kumar Chimanbhai Kachiya ... vs Divisional Controller Gsrtc Nadiad

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 1293
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bhupendra Kumar Chimanbhai Kachiya ...
Respondent
Divisional Controller Gsrtc Nadiad
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals against the Gujarat High Court's decisions regarding the absorption of 'Badali Kamdars' into permanent positions within the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation. The Court interpreted Clause 20 of the settlement dated 21.12.1989, establishing that the benefit of permanent status and time scale should be granted from the date of absorption, not from the initial date of service. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling, affirming that the Corporation's interpretation was correct and dismissing the appeals.

Bhupendra Kumar Chimanbhai Kachiya ... vs Divisional Controller Gsrtc Nadiad · Niyam